The Future of Philosophy: Metaphilosophical Directions for the 21st Century
A Symposium Marking the 40th Anniversary of the Founding of the Journal Metaphilosophy
Date: 11 December
Room G22/26, Senate House South Block, London WC1
Welcome – Barry Smith .
Intro – Armen Marsoobian .
Terrell Ward Bynum (Southern Connecticut State) - Two Philosophers of the Information Age
Terrell Ward Bynum (Southern Connecticut State): Previous scientific and technological revolutions changed our understanding of human nature, the nature of society, and the nature of the universe. The impact upon philosophy was profound. It is not surprising, therefore, that today’s Information Revolution promises to have major philosophical implications. Physicists have recently argued, for example, that the universe is made of information and that human beings are exquisitely complex information objects. In addition new kinds of decision-making agents – such as, robots, softbots, and artificial companions – now can be found in homes, schools, hospitals, workplaces, entertainment centers. Instead of being utterly different from human beings, many computerized devices can be viewed as entities very much like ourselves – fellow information objects journeying together through an informational world. This radically different understanding of human nature and our role in the universe offers exciting, powerful – and to some people, threatening – answers to some of the deepest questions of philosophy and psychology: Who am I? What am I? What does it mean to be? What is my place in the universe? The result is sure to be a worldwide and decades-long philosophical conversation. This presentation is a small part of that conversation – one that briefly discusses just two of the growing number of “philosophers of the Information Age”: Norbert Wiener and Luciano Floridi. This presentation will briefly compare their views on human nature, artificial agents, the nature of society, and the nature of the universe.
Timothy Williamson (Oxford) - Philosophical Expertise and the Burden of Proof
Timothy Williamson (Oxford): ‘Experimental philosophers’ criticize the use of thought experiments in philosophy on the basis of evidence that verdicts on them varies with factors independent of the truth. However, their data concern the verdicts of philosophically untrained subjects. According to the expertise defence, what matters are the verdicts of trained philosophers, who are more likely to pay careful attention to the details of the scenario and track their relevance. In a recent paper, Jonathan Weinberg and others reply to the expertise defence that there is no evidence for such expertise. I reply to them in this paper, arguing that they have misconstrued the dialectical situation. Since they have produced no evidence that philosophical training is less efficacious for thought experimentation than for other cognitive tasks for which they acknowledge that it produces genuine expertise, such as informal argumentation, they have produced no evidence for treating the former more sceptically than the latter.
Philip Kitcher (Columbia) - Philosophy Inside Out
Philip Kitcher (Columbia): In 1920, John Dewey argued for “Reconstruction in Philosophy”, claiming that philosophical discussions had become detached from contemporary human problems and were “a sentimental indulgence for a few”. Dewey’s challenge is as pertinent today as it was then. I shall suggest that some of his own works provide guidance for rethinking the philosophical agenda. In this light, the principal points of philosophical growth are seen as areas often viewed as peripheral, while the supposedly “core questions” are relevant only insofar as they enable people to cope with the issues of primary concern. Philosophy is not only reconstructed, but also turned inside out.
David Papineau (King’s College London) - The Importance of Philosophical Intuition
David Papineau (King’s College London): I shall argue that intuitions about hypothetical cases play a central role in philosophical theorising. They help us to identify deep-seated principles that direct our thinking. These principles can be untrustworthy but even then they are methodologically important. I shall illustrate my points with illustrations from recent debates in the philosophy of mind.
Panel: The Future of Philosophy: Metaphilosophical Directions for the 21st Century
Chair: Armen T. Marsoobian (Editor in Chief, Metaphilosophy)
Responses to “The Future of Philosophy – Metaphilosophical Directions for the 21st Century”
- The Informational Turn » Blog Archive » Two Philosophers of the Information Age
- The Future of Philosophy – Metaphilosophical Directions for the 21st Century «
Leave a reply
- Blind Creations Conference
- London Critical Theory Summer School 2015 – Friday Debate II
- London Critical Theory Summer School 2015 – Friday Debate I
- Southern European Crisis and the Future of Europe
- New Drug Seminars – Psychopharmacology, Identity, and Human Enhancement
- Making Space for Art Symposium
- George Kam Wah Mak – The Annotation Question of the Chinese Protestant Bible in Late Qing China
- Angela Dalle Vacche – What Photographic Cinema Can Teach the Twenty-First Century
- Race, Equality and the Law
- Jack Straw – National Security and the Rule of Law; competing interests or complementary priorities?
- Susanna Siegel – Epistemic Charge
- Restless Futures Conference
- Andrew Gamble – Oakeshott and Totalitarianism
- Giles Pearson – What Are Sources Of Motivation?
- Shakespeare and Waste
- Desert Island Pics: Martin Barnes
- Developing a Career in the Arts – Collaboration & Transferability
- Alenka Zupančič – Power in the Closet (And Its Coming Out)
December 2009 S M T W T F S « Nov Jan » 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
Blind Creations Conference
24 Jul 2015
Making Space for Art Symposium
19 Jun 2015
Restless Futures Conference
11 Jun 2015
Birkbeck Arts Week 2015
18 May 2015
Sanity, Madness and the Family / Family Life: An Urgent Retrospective
24 Apr 2015
Engineering Professors’ Council Congress 2015
14 Apr 2015
The New Jewish Question? The Holocaust, Israel, Antisemitism
1 Apr 2015
Postpolitics and Neoliberalism
24 Mar 2015
Equal Rights for All – A New Path for Israel-Palestine
14 Mar 2015
Narcissism and Melancholia: Reflections on a Century
11 Mar 2015
- Blind Creations Conference
Sign Up For Our Newsletter