Richard Pyle – Towards a Global Names Architecture: The future of indexing scientific names

in Academic Service by on October 28th, 2011

Event Date: 28 October 2011
Flett Lecture Theatre
Natural History Museum

 

Anchoring Biodiversity Information:

From Sherborn to the 21st century and beyond

Richard Pyle
Towards a Global Names Architecture: The future of indexing scientific names 

Bishop Museum, Honolulu, HI, USA & ICZN
Email: deepreef@bishopmuseum.org

For more than 250 years, the taxonomic enterprise has remained almost unchanged. Certainly the tools of the trade have improved: months-long journeys aboard sailing ships have been reduced to hours aboard jet airplanes; advanced technology allows humans to access environments that were once utterly inaccessible; GPS has replaced crude maps; digital hi-resolution imagery provides far more accurate renderings of organisms that even the best commissioned artists of a century ago; and primitive candle-lit microscopes have been replaced by an array of technologies ranging from scanning electron microscopy to DNA sequencing. But the basic paradigm remains the same. Perhaps the most revolutionary change of all ñ which we are still in the midst of, and which has not yet been fully realized ñ is the means by which taxonomists manage and communicate the information of their trade. The rapid evolution in recent decades of computer database management software, and of information dissemination via the internet, have both dramatically improved the potential for streamlining the entire taxonomic process.  Unfortunately, the ìpotentialî still largely exceeds the reality.  The vast majority of taxonomic information is either not-yet digitized, or digitized in a form that does not allow direct and easy access.  Moreover, the information that is easily accessed in digital form is not yet seamlessly interconnected.  In an effort to bring ìrealityî closer to ìpotentialî, a loose affiliation of major taxonomic resources, including GBIF, the Encyclopedia of Life, NBII, Catalog of Life, ITIS, IPNI, ICZN, Index Fungorum, and many others have been crafting a ìGlobal Names Architectureî (GNA).  The intention of the GNA is not to replace any of the existing taxonomic data initiatives, but rather to serve as a dynamic index to interconnect them in a way that streamlines the entire taxonomic enterprise: from gathering specimens in the field, to publication of new taxa and related data.

——————————————————————

talk:

PLAY

 

download

——————————————————————

accompanying images:

 

back to conference page

No Comments

Rod Page – Towards an open taxonomy

in Academic Service by on October 28th, 2011

Event Date: 28 October 2011
Flett Lecture Theatre
Natural History Museum

 

Anchoring Biodiversity Information:

From Sherborn to the 21st century and beyond

Rod Page
Towards an open taxonomy

Professor of Taxonomy, Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine
College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow
Email: r.page@bio.gla.ac.uk

Taxonomy is in many ways still pre-digital. Most taxonomic databases are little more than digitised index cards linking names to often-cryptic bibliographic citations, oblivious to the growing volume of scientific literature that is now online. A growing fraction of taxonomic literature is becoming freely available, either through adoption of Open Access publishing models, or through digitising efforts such as the Biodiversity Heritage Library. Yet much of the most basic information about biodiversity, namely taxonomic description, remains either behind a pay wall, or only available in paper form. This talk sketches the goal of an “Open Taxonomy.” The first step towards this goal is digitally linking scientific names to the primary literature using standard identifiers such as DOIs. I argue that until we make serious inroads into this task, taxonomic knowledge will remain in a ghetto largely ignored by the wider scientific community. will explore the context of CD Sherbornís Index Animalium and those looming problems and issues which a laborious and comprehensive ìindex of natureî was meant to solve.

——————————————————————

talk:

PLAY

 

download

——————————————————————

questions:

PLAY

 

download

——————————————————————

accompanying images:

——————————————————————

 

back to conference page

No Comments

Lyubomir Penev – ZooKeys: Streamlining the registration – to – publication pipeline

in Academic Service by on October 28th, 2011

Event Date: 28 October 2011
Flett Lecture Theatre
Natural History Museum

 

Anchoring Biodiversity Information:

From Sherborn to the 21st century and beyond

Lyubomir Penev
ZooKeys: Streamlining the registration – to – publication pipeline

Pensoft Publishers, Sofia, Bulgaria
Email: info@pensoft.net

Electronic registration of nomenclatural acts is a dynamic process which still needs to be elaborated in accordance with the Biological Codes. The main questions to resolve are: (1) When a registration should take place, before or after publication? (2) Who is doing the registration? (3) Who approves the registration record? (4) Who confirms the validity of the registration record at the moment of publication? (5) At which point a registration record should be validated (e.g., a new name available), on the day of electronic or printed publication? At the International Botanical Congress in Melbourne in July 2011 it became clear that the registration process will be organized in different ways for the different organismsí kingdoms (Fungi, Plants, Protista and Animals).

ZooKeys was the first journal to provide a mandatory registration in ZooBank for all newly described taxa and to include the ZooBankís LSIDs in the original publication. In our view, the registration of nomenclatural acts and the quality control of the bibliographic metadata in ZooBank should be a responsibility of taxonomy publishers. Besides, we are convinced that registration of nomenclatural acts should be mandatory, independently of that will these be published on paper or online-only.

Within the framework of the EU FP7 project ViBRANT, and in a close collaboration with Zoological Record, ZooBank, the International Plant Name Index (IPNI), MycoBank and Index Fungorum, we are elaborating a workflow and associated software tools to streamline the registration within the editorial, publication and dissemination process. The talk will present Pensoftís vision on how to make the registration process secure and cost-efficient, through the currently developed Pensoft Writing Tool (PWT).

——————————————————————

talk:

PLAY

 

download

——————————————————————

questions:

PLAY

 

download

——————————————————————

accompanying images:

——————————————————————

 

back to conference page

No Comments

Sandra Knapp – New workflows for describing and naming organisms

in Academic Service by on October 28th, 2011

Event Date: 28 October 2011
Flett Lecture Theatre
Natural History Museum

 

Anchoring Biodiversity Information:

From Sherborn to the 21st century and beyond

Sandra Knapp
New workflows for describing and naming organisms 

International Association for Plant Taxonomy (IAPT); Intíl Trust for Zoological Nomenclature (ITZN);
Dept. Of Botany, The Natural History Museum;
Email: s.knapp@nhm.ac.uk

Monographs have long been considered the îgold-standardî of taxonomic treatments. These comprehensive compilations of all knowledge about particular taxa or groups of taxa traditionally culminated a taxonomistís career and often took a lifetime to produce. Descriptive taxonomy has been likened to a cottage industry, the antithesis of the big science approach to tackling global problems. Taxonomy itself is currently in a state of flux; opinions differ as to whether revolution or evolution is necessary, and even then, what should actually happen when we do decide. Do we still need ìgold-standardî, life-consuming single-author taxonomic works? Are traditional monographs doomed to go the way to dinosaurs? I will explore the elements of monographic, ìgold-standardî taxonomic work and examine the workflow we traditionally use to produce them. I will suggest that taxonomists are important for only some parts of this workflow, and with that explore what modern taxonomists are really for and by extension what a modern monographic/taxonomic workflow might look like.

——————————————————————

talk:

PLAY

 

download

——————————————————————

questions:

PLAY

 

download

——————————————————————

accompanying images:

——————————————————————

 

back to conference page

No Comments

Chris Freeland – Preserving digitized taxonomic data: problems and solutions for print, manuscript and specimen data

in Academic Service by on October 28th, 2011

Event Date: 28 October 2011
Flett Lecture Theatre
Natural History Museum

 

Anchoring Biodiversity Information:

From Sherborn to the 21st century and beyond

Chris Freeland
Preserving digitized taxonomic data: problems and solutions for print, manuscript and specimen data

Director, Center for Biodiversity Informatics,
Missouri Botanical Garden, St Louis, MO, USA
Email: chris.freeland@mobot.org

The availability of digitized taxonomic data has increased dramatically over the past twenty years as national funding agencies have strengthened their support of digitization activities and as scanning devices have become less expensive and easier to operate.  As such, natural history museums and libraries have taken on new responsibilities for managing electronic information as ways of providing enhanced opportunities for educational outreach and scholarly dissemination.  Museums and libraries have to consider how best to create and care for electronic resources given a volatile technology landscape with rapidly changing file formats and display devices.  This session will address methodologies for responsible curation of digitized prints, manuscripts, and specimens, and will outline best practices for safeguarding digitized taxonomic data to ensure longevity of resources.

——————————————————————

talk:

PLAY

 

download

——————————————————————

questions:

PLAY

 

download

——————————————————————

accompanying images:

——————————————————————

 

back to conference page

No Comments

Daphne Fautin and Miguel Alonso-Zarazaga – LANs: Lists of Available Names a new generation for stable taxonomic names in zoology

in Academic Service by on October 28th, 2011

Event Date: 28 October 2011
Flett Lecture Theatre
Natural History Museum

 

Anchoring Biodiversity Information:

From Sherborn to the 21st century and beyond

Daphne Fautin and Miguel Alonso-Zarazaga

LANs: Lists of Available Names – a new generation for stable taxonomic names in zoology? 

Professor, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Curator, Natural History Museum (Biodiversity Institute) University of Kansas, USA & ICZN

Email: fautin@ku.edu

Depto. de Biodiversidad y BiologÌa Evolutiva Museo Nacional de Ciencias

Naturales Jose Gutierrez Abasca, Madrid, Spain (MNCN-CSIC) & ICZN

Email: zarazaga@mncn.csic.es

Article 79 of the ICZN Code, which appeared first in the Fourth Edition, outlines a procedure for adding large numbers of names to the List of Available Names simultaneously, as a Part of the List. This feature has gained importance with the development of Zoobank, because the LAN can be an important adjunct to or component of Zoobank. Article 79 describes a deliberative process, detailing steps for submission and for consideration by the public and Commission, and their chronology: submission must be by ìan international body of zoologists,î and the proposed Part must be available for ìcomments by zoologistsî for 12 months, followed by another 12-month period for comments on the proposed Part as revised in light of comments received. However, Article 79 it is mute about the contents of the submission. It is clear that adding a Part to the List will prevent long-forgotten names from displacing accepted ones ñ thus, for taxa on the List under the provisions of Article 79, nomenclatural archeology will not be worthwhile. Beyond that, Commissioners who participated in writing the Fourth Edition are divided about the intent of Article 79: some aver it is intended to document every available name within the scope of the Part, others it is to pare the inventory of names within the scope of the Part. The comprehensiveness of the names in the Part is critical because, according to Article 79.4.3, ìNo unlisted name within the scope (taxonomic field, ranks, and time period covered) of an adopted Part of the List of Available Names in Zoology has any status in zoological nomenclature despite any previous availabilityî (names may subsequently be added only ìin exceptional circumstances,î according to Article 79.6). Under the first interpretation, the Part functions as a strictly nomenclatural archive. Under the second interpretation, the Part pares away nomina dubia, so Parts of the List resulting from actions under Article 79 are like the Approved Lists of Bacterial Names that took effect on 1 January 1980 ñ taxonomically recognizable as well as nomenclaturally available. It is critical that a consistent basis for implementing Article 79 be adopted; it is unrealistic to expect unanimity, given the diversity of opinion among those who helped craft Article 79.

——————————————————————

talk:

PLAY

 

download

——————————————————————

questions:

PLAY

 

download

——————————————————————

accompanying images:

——————————————————————

back to conference page

No Comments

David Remsen – Biodiversity Informatics: GBIF’s role in linking information through scientific names

in Academic Service by on October 28th, 2011

Event Date: 28 October 2011
Flett Lecture Theatre
Natural History Museum

 

Anchoring Biodiversity Information:

From Sherborn to the 21st century and beyond

David Remsen
Biodiversity Informatics: GBIF’s role in linking information through scientific names

Senior Programme Officer. Electronic Catalog of Names of Known Organisms
Global Biodiversity Information Facility Secretariat, Copenhagen, Denmark
Email: dremsen@gbif.org

The Global Biodiversity Information Facility provides access to primary biodiversity data.   It currently provides access to over 300 million data records from over 8000 different databases.    Data customers expect to be able to retrieve data records organised around taxa.   The challenges in integrating these data, originating in different sources, is considerable and requires access to both taxonomic and nomenclatural authority files.   These challenges and the subsequent capabilities these resources enables are presented.

——————————————————————

talk:

PLAY

 

download

——————————————————————

questions:

PLAY

 

download

——————————————————————

accompanying images:

 

back to conference page

No Comments

Henning Scholz – BHL-Europe: Tools and Services for Legacy Taxonomic Literature

in Academic Service by on October 28th, 2011

Event Date: 28 October 2011
Flett Lecture Theatre
Natural History Museum

 

Anchoring Biodiversity Information:

From Sherborn to the 21st century and beyond

Henning Scholz
BHL-Europe: Tools and Services for Legacy Taxonomic Literature 

History of Science and Technology Programme,
University of Kingís College, Halifax, NS, CANADA
Email: gmcouat@dal.ca

 

Literature research is the base for the scientific work of taxonomists. Therefore, large and well-curated natural history libraries are a very important prerequisite to carry out scientific projects efficiently. The library work, however, has several serious limitations that slow down the work significantly. The natural history library corpus is highly fragmented and scattered. In particular much of the early published literature is rare or is only available in a very few libraries. A lot of time and effort is involved to find and collect all scientific works that are necessary for a specific project.

Today, quick and easy access to digital literature is more and more important to facilitate scientific work. Over the last few years a large number of library resources for taxonomists have been made available online. Since 2007, the Biodiversity Heritage Library (BHL) project is digitising the biodiversity literature holdings of numerous libraries in the UK and USA and making them available on the internet.

Since 2009, the eContentplus project Biodiversity Heritage Library for Europe (BHL-Europe) is developing four different access routes to the biodiversity literature digitised by many European and global partners over the last years. With the Global References Index to Biodiversity (GRIB, http://grib.gbv.de/), BHL-Europe provides in collaboration with the EDIT project a union catalogue of library holdings of many European and US libraries. This will facilitate the search for literature, either digitised or not. This tool will also facilitate the management of digitisation projects all over the world and collect scan request from the scientific community. For an effective access to already digitised literature, BHL-Europe is building a multilingual portal for the scientific community. This portal will also have functionalities currently not available in the BHL portal. The BHL-Europe Portal will, for example, facilitate the search for common and scientific names of biological organisms as well as person names through the implementation of various webservices (e.g. Catalogue of Life, VIAF). The backbone of the portal is a preservation and archive system built on a customised storage infrastructure housed by the Natural History Museum in London. We are currently collecting digitised literature from 27 different content providers on our servers, including all the content that is currently available through the BHL portal (http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org). In order to serve also a broader audience, the digitised literature available by BHL-Europe is also accessible by Europeana, Europe’s digital library, archive and museum (http://www.europeana.eu/).

——————————————————————

talk:

PLAY

 

download

——————————————————————

questions:

PLAY

 

download

——————————————————————

accompanying images:

——————————————————————

 

back to conference page

No Comments

Anchoring Biodiversity Information: From Sherborn to the 21st century and beyond

in Academic Service - Archive, conference by on October 28th, 2011

Event Date: 28 October 2011
Flett Lecture Theatre
Natural History Museum
London SW7 5BD

Anchoring Biodiversity Information: From Sherborn to the 21st century and beyond

Charles Davies Sherborn provided the bibliographic foundation for current zoological nomenclature with his magnum opus Index Animalium. In the 43 years he spent working on this extraordinary resource, he anchored our understanding of animal diversity through the published scientific record. No work has equalled it since and it is still in current, and critical, use.

Until now, Sherborn’s contribution has been recognised by professional taxonomists worldwide but he has escaped the celebration of his accomplishment that is his due. We will hold a symposium in his honour in the 150th year of his birth here at the NHM, with an international panel of experts on bibliography and biodiversity bioinformatics, linking a view of the past with an active debate on the future of the related fields.

——————————————————————-

Welcome and Logistics / Introduction and dedication to Frank Bisby
(1945-2011)
Ellinor Michel (ICZN) & Graham Higley (BHL & NHM Libraries) .

——————————————————————-

Opening Keynote: SHNH Annual Ramsbottom Lecture

Neal Evenhuis (Bishop Museum)
Charles Davies Sherborn and the Indexer’s Club
[AUDIO HERE]

 ——————————————————————-

Gordon McOuat (Univ of King’s College, Halifax)
Sherborn’s context: Cataloguing nature in the late 19th century
[AUDIO HERE]

 ——————————————————————-

Session 1: History of Taxonomic Literature, Indexing and Traditional Taxonomic Nomenclature

Edward Dickinson (Aves Press)
Reinforcing the foundations: Filling in the bibliographic gaps in the historical legacy
[AUDIO HERE]

 ——————————————————————-

F. Christian Thompson (Smithsonian) and Thomas Pape (Copenhagen)
Systema Dipterorum: Sherborn’s critical influence in getting information control over a megadiverse group
[AUDIO HERE]

 ——————————————————————-

Smithsonian Institution Libraries (Suzanne Pilsk, Martin Kalfatovic, Joel Richard)
Unlocking the Index Animalium: From paper slips to bytes and bits
[AUDIO HERE]

 ——————————————————————-

Nigel Robinson (Zoological Record)
Sherborn’s Index Animalium integration into ION: access to all
[AUDIO HERE]

download

 ——————————————————————-

Session 2: Current Taxonomic Practices

Chris Lyal (NHM)
Digitising legacy taxonomic literature: processes, products and using the output
[AUDIO HERE]

 ——————————————————————-

Henning Scholz (Museum für Naturkunde Berlin)
BHL-Europe: Tools and Services for Legacy Taxonomic Literature
[AUDIO HERE]

  ——————————————————————-

David Remsen (GBIF)
Biodiversity Informatics: GBIF’s role in linking information through scientific names
[AUDIO HERE]

 ——————————————————————-

Daphne Fautin (Univ. Kansas/ICZN) & Miguel Alonso-Zarazaga (MNCN-CSIC/ICZN)
LANs: Lists of Available Names – a new generation for stable taxonomic names in zoology?
[AUDIO HERE]

 ——————————————————————-

Session 3: Future of Biological Nomenclature

Chris Freeland (Missouri Botanical Garden)
Preserving digitized taxonomic data: problems and solutions for print, manuscript and specimen data
[AUDIO HERE]

  ——————————————————————-

Sandra Knapp (NHM/IAPT/ITZN)
New workflows for describing and naming organisms
[AUDIO HERE]

 ——————————————————————-

Lyubomir Penev (Pensoft Publishers)
ZooKeys: Streamlining the registration – to – publication pipeline
[AUDIO HERE]

  ——————————————————————-

Rod Page (Univ. Glasgow)
Towards an open taxonomy
[AUDIO HERE]

  ——————————————————————-

Closing Keynote:
Richard Pyle (Bishop Museum, HI, USA)
Towards a Global Names Architecture: The future of indexing scientific names
[AUDIO HERE]

 ——————————————————————-

Panel and audience discussion on the history and future of animal names

PLAY

 

download

——————————————————————-

Poster presentations also contributed to the symposium. Here are the authors talking about their work:

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

P. Bouchard, Y. Bousquet, A.E. Davies, M.A. Alonso-Zarazaga C.H.C. Lyal, A.F. Newton & A.B.T. Smith
Towards  a complete list of family-group names in Coleoptera (Insecta) with comments on dates of publication.
P. Bouchard, Y. Bousquet & A.E. Davies
Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids and Nematodes, Agriculture and Agri-Food, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
M.A. Alonso-Zarazaga
Departamento de Biodiversidad y BiologÌa Evolutiva, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, Jose Gutierrez Abascal, Madrid, Spain
C.H.C. Lyal
Department of Entomology, The Natural History Museum, London
A.F. Newton
Zoology Department, Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, USA
A.B.T. Smith
Canadian Museum of Nature, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Coleopterists recently synthesized data on all known extant and fossil Coleoptera family-group names for the first time (Fig. 1). A catalogue of 4887 family-group names (124 fossil, 4763 extant) based on 4707 distinct genera in Coleoptera was given. A total of 4492 names were determined to available. Names were listed in a classification framework. The authors recognized as valid 24 superfamilies, 211 families, 541 subfamilies, 1663 tribes and 740 subtribes.
   For each name, the original spelling, author, year of publication, page number, correct stem and type genus were included. The original spelling and availability of each name were checked from primary literature.
   Here we provide information about the resources that were used to infer the correct date of publication of works in which Coleoptera family-group names were proposed. We compare these resources with those that previous workers, such as C.D. Sherborn, would have used for similar projects before the advent of computers and the internet.

PLAY

 

download

(click thumbnail to load poster in new window,use the zoom function or cmd+/cmd- to size appropriately for your screen)

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Sherborniana – Artifacts of historical and heritage value from the Natural History Museum relating to CDS’s professional and personal collections

Paul Martyn Cooper

PLAY

 

download

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Henning Scholz (Museum für Naturkunde Berlin)
BLE – BHL – Europe’s virtual exhibition

Jiri Frank &  Jiri Kvacek 
National museum in Prague,  Czech Republic

Jana Hoffmann
Museum f¸r Naturkunde, Leibniz Institute for Research on Evolution and Biodiversity at the Humboldt University Berlin, Germany
The Biodiversity Library Exhibition (BLE) is a virtual exhibition of the digital content in the Biodiversity Heritage Library for Europe. It is a dissemination and e-learning tool which highlights specific biodiversity content and makes it accessible for a wider audience. The first two exhibitions will feature BHL-Europe’s content on “spices” and “expeditions”, presenting beautiful illustrations and informative text in old and rare books. It will also provide useful information for the visitor, e.g. recipes. The attractive design and easy to use interface of BLE has a great potential to show that historical literature on biodiversity can be of interesting to a wide audience.

PLAY

 

download

(click thumbnail to load poster in new window,use the zoom function or cmd+/cmd- to size appropriately for your screen)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Peter Oboyski, Joan Ball, Traci Grzymala & Kipling Will

Calbug: Digitization of California¹s Terrestrial Arthropods

Peter Oboyski, Joan Ball, Traci Grzymala & Kipling Will
Essig Museum of Entomology, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA
Email: kipwill@berkeley.edu

Sherborn’s legacy now transcends the capture of taxonomic literature to the capture of individual specimen data from museum collections on which literature records are based. While the basic concepts and standards in data management still apply new challenges need to be met, including new data types and formats, sharing data across platforms, and the sheer volume of information to be managed.
   Although most biological data standards are now well-established, databasing of entomology collections has lagged behind other collections largely due to the quantity of specimens and the highly abbreviated and inconsistent data found on very small specimen labels. Calbug is an NSF funded collaborative of the eight major entomology collections in California that intends to capture 1.1 million specimen-level data records from our combined holdings in a Darwin Core-compliant MySQL relational database.
   We will analyze these data using geospatial technology to understand the relationship between changes in distribution and the precise nature and extent of habitat modification. Given that successfully capturing 1.1 million records would only account for a small fraction of our combined holdings, development of time-saving methods and technology for getting data from labels into databases is paramount. In the initial stage of the project we have focused on developing and testing methods and workflows to radically increase the rate of data capture, while maximizing data quality appropriate for the biotic change analyses. Digital imaging of data labels provides a more easily viewed verbatim archive of specimen data and allows subsequent off-site data entry from image files using manual entry, crowd-sourcing, and automated OCR and data parsing.
   Specimen handling, both in terms of time and risk to specimens, remains a significant obstacle to retrospective data capture from entomological collections. Georeferencing is also a challenge due to the highly abbreviated and inconsistent nature of location data on specimen labels, but a number of strategies that combine computer and human data handling are being used.

PLAY

 

download

(click thumbnail to load poster in new window,use the zoom function or cmd+/cmd- to size appropriately for your screen)

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Karolyn Shindler & Ellinor Michel

Charles Davies Sherborn: A magpie with a card index mind: Charles Davies Sherborn 1861-1942

ICZN & Natural History Museum, London, UK
Email: karolynshindler@aol.com

Charles Davies Sherborn was geologist, indexer and bibliographer extraordinaire. He was fascinated by science from an early age – although there are probably very few small boys who attempt to construct volcanoes in their gardens, the consequent explosion resulting in a visit from the police. Like so many Victorians, the young Sherborn was a passionate natural history collector and was obsessed with expanding his collection of land and freshwater shells. He later described himself as being a ‘thorough magpie’ and having ‘a card-index mind’, and these two traits coalesced in his monumental Index Animalium, an index of every known living and extinct animal from 1758 to 1850.  The Index was a true labour of love – and shamefully little financial reward – that occupied 43 years of his life. One of the first visitors through the doors of the Natural History Museum in South Kensington when it opened in 1881, Sherborn began work there seven years later as one of the small band of unofficial scientific workers, paid by the number of fossils he prepared. By the time of his death in 1942, Sherbornís corner in the Museum was the first port of call for generations of scientists seeking advice, information ñ or an invitation to one of his famous ìsmoke and chatî parties.
   In addition to his work on the Index, Sherborn is also responsible for rescuing the correspondence, manuscripts and books of Sir Richard Owen, the great Victorian comparative anatomist and the prime mover behind the creation of the NHM. The papers were ‘in a cow-shed, exposed to rats and rain’. The manuscripts were piled twelve feet high, while the correspondence filled countless packing cases. But for Sherborn, this was very heaven. In high excitement he wrote to a friend, ‘I must husband all my time and strength now, for it is a giant’s task set before me, and this must cap…my other works’.

PLAY

 

download

(click thumbnail to load poster in new window,use the zoom function or cmd+/cmd- to size appropriately for your screen)

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Darwin: A systematic naturalist, a virtuoso or a miser?

Brian Rosen & Jill Darrell
Dept. of Zoology & Dept. of Palaeontology, Natural History Museum, London, UK
Email: B.Rosen@nhm.ac.uk

Although the publication details of many natural history specimens are generally well-documented in museum collections, it is also not uncommon for the published status of other specimens, such as types, to be incomplete, uncertain or unknown. This can happen when original documentation was insufficient, or when it has become separated from the specimen, mislaid, or even lost altogether. Here, we suggest a methodological framework (‘collection trajectory’) for reconstructing or recovering such information.
   Charles Robert Darwin (1809-1882) was a prolific collector of geological and biological specimens. As he said of himself, ‘The passion for collecting, which leads a man to be a systematic naturalist, a virtuoso or a miser, was very strong in me, & was clearly innate, as none of my sisters or brother ever had this taste’. Provisional results of a recent survey carried out by us suggest that the Natural History Museum holds over 14,000 of his specimens, including significant types, and almost entirely biological. The bulk of them are beetles and barnacles, though the Museum also holds most of his birds, mammals (living and fossil), fish, reptiles and amphibians, as described in the ‘Zoology of the Beagle’ (Darwin 1838-43).  Substantial Darwin collections also exist elsewhere, notably his geological material at the University of Cambridge.
   Many labels of Darwin’s specimens give only very brief information, while other specimens which might have been collected and/or studied by Darwin, bear little or no evidence of that. Many people therefore think that Darwin’s specimen documentation was poor. In fact, he was extremely methodical in this, and worked hard to practise his own advice that the ‘collector’s motto’ should be ‘ ‘Trust nothing to the memory’, for the memory becomes a fickle guardian when one interesting object is succeeded by another still more interesting.’ As a result, he left us a complex legacy of lists, field notebooks and diaries.  Ironically though, this complexity can make it difficult to find the necessary information about a given specimen. It is therefore essential to understand the relationship between these various sources, and also Darwinís specimen numbering system.
   How can this legacy be used to recover relevant information for any given specimen?  Our ‘generalized collection trajectory’ provides a nine-point framework for working methodically through all the potential sources of information about a given collection of Darwin’s.  We also suggest that a similar approach might be used for other people’s collections where similar problems exist.  For Darwin in particular, this led us to revise and extend earlier reviews of Darwin’s specimen lists.  In our poster, (and as an aid to identifying previously uncertain specimens), we include illustrations of the number-tags Darwin used for his dry specimens, and give examples showing how our trajectory approach sheds further light on some examples of NHM coral reef specimens.

PLAY

 

download

(click thumbnail to load poster in new window,use the zoom function or cmd+/cmd- to size appropriately for your screen)

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

F. W. Welter-Schultes, A. Görlich & A. Lutze

Sherborn’s Index Animalium – Systematic errors, mistakes and outdated judgements in the light of modern zoological nomenclature: An analysis based on the examination of 40,000 taxonomic names.
F. W. Welter-Schultes, A. Görlich & A. Lutze 
AnimalBase and Index Animalium
Welter-Schultes, F. 
Zoologisches Institut der Universit‰t, Göttingen
Görlich, A. &  Lutze, A.
E-mail: fwelter@gwdg.de
Appreciating Sherborn’s tremendous work implies understanding to which extent Sherborn’s index data can be used for nomenclatural purposes today. In the course of the AnimalBase project to digitise early zoological literature and provide a taxonomic names database we cross-checked our own manual examinations of 40,000 new names in the original sources with those of Sherborn’s Index Animalium. For each examined work we extracted all new names under the present-day nomenclatural rules (4th edition of the ICZN Code), and compared our results with Sherborn’s list extracted from the same work.
   It was crucial to know how to read the Index, only 70% of the 420,000 names in Sherborn’s list were marked as new (300,000 new names). We found that Sherborn’s data were consistent with our own finds at an average rate of 80-90 %. The degree of reliability of Sherborn’s data differed by work and by animal group, and depended on various factors. The rate of misspellings in Sherborn’s manual work was low, lower than in the AnimalBase project, but naturally not zero. The proportion of overlooked names in each work depended on its style. Sherborn did not have all important works at his disposal.
   Some categories of systematic errors and mistakes were under Sherborn’s responsibility (obvious difficulties in understanding foreign languages except Latin, careless examination of difficult works to save time, neglecting subspecific names), others have to do with the nomenclatural rules having changed in the past 100 years (criteria for availability of names, corrections of incorrect Latin, authorships for names, unavailability of non-binominal works).
   Sherborn was confronted with many problems we also had in our own work. This included the difficulty to maintain a common standard over time. We came to the conclusion that anyone who intends to repeat Sherborn’s job will inevitably be fascinated by his low non-systematic error rates.

PLAY

 

download

 

(click thumbnail to load poster in new window,use the zoom function or cmd+/cmd- to size appropriately for your screen)

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Leslie Overstreet & Grace Constantino

Online Synergy: Sherborn’s Ondex Animalium & the Biodiversity Heritage Library

 

(click thumbnail to load poster in new window,use the zoom function or cmd+/cmd- to size appropriately for your screen)

________________________________________________________________

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Sponsors

  • ICZN – Int’l Commission on Zoological Nomenclature
  • SHNH – Society for the History of Natural History
  • Linnean Society
  • BHL-Europe – Biodiversity Heritage Library-Europe
  • Pensoft Publishers (ZooKeys)
  • NHM – Natural History Museum, Science Directorate
  • ViBRANT – Virtual Biodiversity

Supportive organisations
Geological Association, ZSL – Zoological Society of London, NMNH Smithsonian Institution Libraries, NHM Libraries, NHM Centre for Arts and Humanities (CAH), The Ray Society, Aves Press (Zoological Bibliography), Zoological Record, The Natural History Book Store, IAPT (Int’l Assoc Plant Taxonomy), Minding Animals International

A recent article in the Telegraph and the NHM house journal evolve begins the celebration of Sherborn in this anniversary year: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/8646534/Charles-Davies-Sherborn-the-Natural-History-Museums-magpie-with-a-card-index-mind.html

 

No Comments

Chris Lyal – Digitising legacy taxonomic literature: processes, products and using the output

in Academic Service by on October 28th, 2011

Event Date: 28 October 2011
Flett Lecture Theatre
Natural History Museum

 

Anchoring Biodiversity Information:

From Sherborn to the 21st century and beyond

Chris Lyal
Digitising legacy taxonomic literature: processes, products and using the output 

Department of Entomology, Natural History Museum. London
Email: c.lyal@nhm.ac.uk

To date, most digitisation of taxonomic literature has led to a more or less simple digital copy of a paper original ñ the output has effectively been an electronic copy of a traditional library. While this has increased accessibility of publications through internet access, for many scientific papers the means of indexing and locating them is much the same as with traditional libraries. OCR and born-digital papers allow use of web search engines to locate instances of taxon names and other terms, but OCR efficiency in recognising names is still relatively poor, peopleís ability to use search engines effectively is mixed, and many papers cannot be directly searched. Instead of building digital analogues of traditional publications, we should consider what properties we require of future taxonomic information access. Ideally the content of each new digital publication should be accessible in the context of all previous published data, and the user able to retrieve nomenclatural, taxonomic and other data / information in the form required without having to scan all of the original paper and extract target content manually. This opens the door to dynamic linking of new content with extant systems ñ automatic population and updating of taxonomic catalogues, ZooBank and faunal lists, all descriptions of a taxon and its children instantly accessible with a single search, comparison of classifications used in different publications, and so on. The means to do this is currently marking up content into XML, the more atomised the mark-up the greater the possibilities for data retrieval and integration. Mark-up requires XML that accommodates the required content elements and is interoperable with other XML schemas, and there are now several written to do this, particularly TaxPub, taxonX and taXMLit, the last of these being the most atomised. Building on earlier systems for mark-up of legacy literature ViBRANT is developing a new workflow and seeking to increase the automated component of the process. Manual and automatic data and information retrieval is demonstrated by projects such as INOTAXA and Plazi. As we move to creating and using taxonomic products through the power of the internet, we need to ensure the output, while satisfying the requirements of the Code, is fit for purpose in the future.

——————————————————————

talk:

PLAY

 

download

——————————————————————

questions:

PLAY

 

download

——————————————————————

accompanying images:

back to conference page

No Comments